machines: using them/using us is a thought that has been swimming around my head quite a lot recently.
we develop technologies that WE USE to MAKE US more efficient, informed, communicative...
in turn, the machines have started to attach themselves to us, emotionally, physically, cognitively... as we become
tethered to them.
as Sherry Turkle writes (you should have clicked the link above, or if you don't feel like reading have a
listen)
"whether or not our devices are in use, without them we feel adrift - adrift not only from our current realities, but for our wishes for the future."
checking facts midst-discussion on your iphone? waiting (frantically) for your next email on your blackberry? obsessively checking your facebook feed?
sitting across the table from your phone when you're sans friends?
as we turn to gadgets for companionship, learning, expression....why don't they look (and act) like what they are, instead of hiding in the bodies of calculators?
some people
dress their gadgets upbut what if gadgets had their own personalities? (
dunne&raby rendition)
or they needed to use you, and more explicitly so?

above, the helpless robot at
SPACEthe handles beg you to pull and push it, and once you have, it always wants more...and tells you so. with a human voice.
sweet idea, but makes me wonder how objects might put us to use in more organic-symbiotic-natural-everyday ways. to, perhaps, make our attachment more explicit? (and allow us to reflect...) or, to make us work for our use? (because nothing is free)